Reshape disjoint for cross-module specialisation#589
Draft
Conversation
Keep disjoint's recursive workers local under its INLINE wrapper and thread SPEC through the recursion. This gives client modules a better chance to get both type specialisation and SpecConstr on the same hot path, especially for collision handling. Assisted-by: Codex
sjakobi
force-pushed
the
disjoint-spec-constr
branch
from
7e079bb to
b02833e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I asked Codex to take a stab at making SpecConstr work for
disjoint. I'm recording the result here so I can take a closer look later.