Skip to content

Spcs/bsiv21 docs#643

Merged
riteshnoronha merged 4 commits into
interlynk-io:mainfrom
viveksahu26:spcs/bsiv21-docs
May 8, 2026
Merged

Spcs/bsiv21 docs#643
riteshnoronha merged 4 commits into
interlynk-io:mainfrom
viveksahu26:spcs/bsiv21-docs

Conversation

@viveksahu26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR adds the following chnages:

  • Adds the BSI:v2.1 compliance docs
  • Corresponding fields and it's field mappings

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 27, 2026 16:52
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds BSI TR-03183-2 v2.1.0 compliance field-reference documentation (including field definitions and SPDX/CycloneDX mappings) and normalizes heading formatting in existing BSI reference docs.

Changes:

  • Added new bsi-v21-compliance.md reference doc for TR-03183-2 v2.1.0, including required/additional/optional fields and mapping guidance.
  • Adjusted section heading levels in bsi-v11-compliance.md and bsi-v20-compliance.md to use consistent ### <n>. <title> headings.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

File Description
docs/reference/bsi-v21-compliance.md New v2.1.0 field reference and mapping documentation.
docs/reference/bsi-v20-compliance.md Heading-level normalization in the BSI reference doc.
docs/reference/bsi-v11-compliance.md Heading-level normalization in the BSI reference doc.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread docs/reference/bsi-v20-compliance.md
Comment thread docs/reference/bsi-v21-compliance.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/reference/bsi-v21-compliance.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/reference/bsi-v21-compliance.md Outdated
@riteshnoronha riteshnoronha merged commit e491e60 into interlynk-io:main May 8, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants