Status review for unfinished articles

[peruibeloko]

I went over the translation checklist and classified each item in one of three categories:

• Unchecked: Item is present in the master branch but not marked as done
• Abandoned: Item has work present on a fork but the PR is either closed or absent
• Untouched: Item is assigned to someone but it wasn't worked on at all

And this is the current status:

Item	Status
Basic operators, math	Unchecked (#217, #412)
Loops: while and for	Abandoned (#50)
Functions	Untouched
Object references and copying	Unchecked
Symbol type	Unchecked
Numbers	Untouched (under @rnrnshn)
WeakMap and WeakSet	Untouched (under @wnleao)
Object.keys, values, entries	Abandoned
Destructuring assignment	Untouched
Date and time	Untouched
JSON methods, toJSON	Abandoned (#185)
Recursion and stack	Abandoned
Rest parameters and spread syntax	Untouched
Variable scope, closure	Untouched
The old "var"	Untouched
Scheduling: setTimeout and setInterval	Untouched
Function binding	Untouched
Property getters and setters	Abandoned
Class inheritance	Untouched
Static properties and methods	Untouched
Extending built-in classes	Abandoned (#411)
Error handling, "try...catch"	Untouched
Custom errors, extending Error	Abandoned
Introduction: callbacks	Abandoned
Promise	Untouched
Error handling with promises	Untouched (under @wnleao)
Promise API	Untouched
Promisification	Untouched (under @wnleao)
Microtasks	Untouched (under @wnleao)
Async/await	Untouched
Modules, introduction	Untouched
Currying	Untouched
Browser environment, specs	Abandoned
DOM tree	Abandoned
Walking the DOM	Abandoned
Attributes	Review pending (broken mention @denis-rossati)
Introduction to browser events	Untouched (broken mention to @cesarkohl)
Form properties and methods	Untouched (broken mention to @recalderon)
Fetch	Abandoned (broken mention to @vitorinoaraujo)
Bezier curve	Abandoned (broken mention to @lucastrvsn)
JavaScript animations	Abandoned (broken mention to @karlasamantha)
Template element	Untouched (broken mention to @HakaCode)

We can solve some of these problems as such:

• Abandoned articles can be resumed through a new PR
• Untouched articles assigned over a certain period (6 months, 1 year) can be safely unassigned and reopened for translation
• Unchecked articles can be safely checked for updated tracking

What does everyone think?

[odsantos]

@peruibeloko I agree but we probably need to be sure that Untouched topics have no PR, so three months might also be a good waiting period. Thanks.

[peruibeloko]

@odsantos most of the Untouched topics are months or years out of date with master. I can go over them and append the age of the assignment if you'd like

[odsantos]

@peruibeloko no, there is no need, as long as no work is present this seems good. Thanks.

[peruibeloko]

Glad to help, let me know if you need anything!

[HakaCode]

@peruibeloko @odsantos

I will arrange it as soon as possible, I had forgotten to translate, thank you for reminding me.

[peruibeloko]

@HakaCode thanks! Just a quick reminder to keep the PR contained to the specific as article you're translating!

[HakaCode]

@peruibeloko @odsantos I think now I just wait for it to be reviewed and accepted.

[danilolmc]

Hey guys!

About the Extending built-in classes article, I'm now just waiting a review in the #413 PR

I also translated these two articles below, but they are unchecked even thought I created their pull request with their article titles:

• Object references and copying Object references and copying #408
• Symbol type Symbol type #409

How can I mark them as checked?

[peruibeloko]

@danilolmc I didn't include your class extension article since I remember seeing you picking it one of these days.

Marking them as done is probably restricted to either the bot or @iliakan

[danilolmc]

Great, thank you! @peruibeloko

[jonnathan-ls]

Abandoned articles can be resumed through a new PR

Instead of reopening the PR, we could contribute directly to it (PR number), and if the user's branch or repository is protected, then the task goes on to be reopened in a new PR, what do you think?

In reviews, I'm looking to contribute by adding commits directly to the user's forked repository that is associated with the PR, instead of just registering my comments for simple things, trying to speed up the merge process, instead of waiting for the user's response that may have abandoned the PR

[jonnathan-ls]

Hey guys!
...
How can I mark them as checked?

@danilolmc

My deduction, the bot apparently did not act on the PRs because the merger was apparently carried out without following the necessary review steps (review and approval process) and perhaps because it failed to mark the PR's hash on the list due to absences in the approval and registration procedures of the task on behalf of the person.

Marking them as done is probably restricted to either the bot or iliakan

Maintainers have the permission to update PR #1.

I have updated the list considering the PRs have been completed.

[jonnathan-ls]

I agree but we probably need to be sure that Untouched topics have no PR, so three months might also be a good waiting period. Thanks.

I agree with 03 months instead of 06, we need agility and evolution of this repository instead of waiting for PRs that haven't even been touched yet.

[savionascimentodev]

Hello everyone, I would really like to contribute to this repository, but I'm kind of new to open source projects, I saw that there are a lot of PRs open and after this list that @peruibeloko sent, it gave me a little idea, but if I want to contribute , is there anyone active I can talk to?

Note: Or I just raise a Pr and who knows, one day it will be approved.