There is a tidbit about this package in this now widely shared blog post.
As you can see, it is under the "implicit type conversions". But after "a reader of this blog" (you can guess who he is) pointed out the factual error in the accusation, it is not about implicit type conversions at all. Instead, it is about whether batch_size should be a proportion and according to the writer, 3 persons didn't understand what does batch_size mean.
I think the documentation has explained clearly what the batch_size does and in my opinion, it makes a lot of sense for it to be a proportion. But I am afraid some people might think that this parameter works similarly to gensim's chunksize.
There is a tidbit about this package in this now widely shared blog post.
As you can see, it is under the "implicit type conversions". But after "a reader of this blog" (you can guess who he is) pointed out the factual error in the accusation, it is not about implicit type conversions at all. Instead, it is about whether
batch_sizeshould be a proportion and according to the writer, 3 persons didn't understand what doesbatch_sizemean.I think the documentation has explained clearly what the
batch_sizedoes and in my opinion, it makes a lot of sense for it to be a proportion. But I am afraid some people might think that this parameter works similarly to gensim'schunksize.