[mforce]

Why

web/src/i18n/tl.ts glossaryDiscountDef ended "hindi ilinalagay". The standard imperfective passive of ilagay is inilalagay — i- + the -in- infix + CV reduplication of the root. ilinalagay metathesises the infix; it is attested in some usage but is not the standard form.

The decisive evidence is internal, not external. The same catalog already uses the standard pattern: tl.ts:305 reads "Nananatili ang iyong mga inilagay". So this was the locale disagreeing with itself about the same verb, which is precisely the class #688 exists for — and #688's whole point is that nothing mechanical catches it, because catalogParity compares key sets and a value can drift freely.

Why it was not fixed when it was raised

An automated reviewer flagged it during #720 (PR #734) and marked it SUSPECTED, which was honest — neither the reviewer nor the driver is a native speaker. It was filed to #738 for the native-speaker pass rather than changed, on the correct principle that substituting one non-native guess for another is not an improvement.

Two things changed. The native-speaker es/tl review was declined by the owner on 2026-09-13 (#182), so there is no pass to wait for. And the internal inconsistency above is a stronger argument than the reviewer's: it does not require judging Tagalog from outside, only noticing that the catalog contradicts itself.

The other half of #738 is deliberately NOT changed

Item 2 asked whether es should use por encima de rather than sobre for "above list". CodeRabbit raised it as an internal inconsistency, it was refuted with evidence, and the reviewer withdrew it — all five keys agree with each other (aboveList, glossaryAboveListTerm, listPriceHintAbove, listPriceHintAboveNoPct, and the help prose all read "Sobre el precio de lista").

What remains is a style preference, not a defect, and there is no internal contradiction to settle it. Changing it would be exactly the non-native substitution this PR's first half avoided. Left as written.

Verification

• npm run typecheck — clean.
• npx vitest run src/i18n — 316 tests, 8 files, all passing, including catalogParity and badgeCase.
• grep confirms one occurrence in the repo; no other string carried the variant.

No screenshot is attached despite the #662 rule. That rule's trigger is what a reader can no longer check from the diff; this is a single word in a string literal, fully legible in the diff, with no layout, state or styling change.

Closes #738

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: b43533cb-e4a3-4683-8975-0ff080fbc2d4

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}