-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
Infer contextual types from generic return types #29478
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b4bce2
Infer contextual types from return types through generic functions
ahejlsberg da9feca
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg bb1c91f
Remove literal freshness when contextual type is a literal type
ahejlsberg 4163d2d
Add tests
ahejlsberg c809002
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg 0b366ce
Address CR feedback
ahejlsberg 0b1da02
Add missing return statements (ugh)
ahejlsberg 60e7528
No union type reductions in contextual types
ahejlsberg dbea08f
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg cf479fc
Add regression test for #29168
ahejlsberg 2ea0251
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg 7c1bb14
Merge branch 'master' into fixContextualReturnTypes
ahejlsberg fffd774
Merge branch 'master' into fixContextualReturnTypes
ahejlsberg c581575
Add breaking change repros
ahejlsberg 42be36d
Accept new baselines
ahejlsberg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This
mapTypecall should probably have it's third argument set since we're in contextual typing and preservingstring | "x"'s literaliness is desirable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also: I'm wondering why bother with the map type/instantiate flag check at all -
instantiateTypeis only going to instantiate instantiable types anyway.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you change the
mapTypeI think you can go ahead and close #29174.(or ping me and I’ll close it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@weswigham Agreed, we should make sure we use
UnionReduction.None. The reason we don't just callinstantiateTypeis thatgetContextualMapperisn't a super cheap operation and also that we don't want to instantiate contained object types as it is unnecessary and can be expensive.@jack-williams I'll fix it so we don't need #29174.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ahejlsberg Grand, closing the PR. Might be worth adding the example from #29168 to this PR, just to make sure it’s fixed.