You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
URL Query Parameter Expansion for OAuth2.0 Client #867
Following from #345, it'd be useful if we could get the ability to have a few additional URL query parameters to allow for specifying the new fields dynamically at URL team.
The rationale behind this, we use containerization for our local development ecosystem and per #622 we're unable to pass a formal configuration; though looking at that PR I'm not even sure support was added for such configuration.
Thank you for reporting this, and apologies for the long wait for a response.
v1 will receive security fixes only — this issue describes a functionality, compatibility, or usability problem rather than a vulnerability, so it is being closed against v1. This is not a judgment on whether the problem is real — it's a consequence of the v1 line being frozen. This is happening as part of #1872.
If this still happens in v2, we'd genuinely like to know. v2 is a complete rewrite — three clients over a shared core — so many v1 behaviours no longer exist in the same form. Please open a fresh issue against v2 with steps to reproduce, and we'll look at it. Note that we accept external contributions as issues rather than pull requests; maintainers handle design and implementation through a prompt-driven workflow. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
Activity
cliffhall commentedon Aug 1, 2026
Closing: v1 is deprecated.
Thank you for reporting this, and apologies for the long wait for a response.
v1 will receive security fixes only — this issue describes a functionality, compatibility, or usability problem rather than a vulnerability, so it is being closed against v1. This is not a judgment on whether the problem is real — it's a consequence of the v1 line being frozen. This is happening as part of #1872.
If this still happens in v2, we'd genuinely like to know. v2 is a complete rewrite — three clients over a shared core — so many v1 behaviours no longer exist in the same form. Please open a fresh issue against v2 with steps to reproduce, and we'll look at it. Note that we accept external contributions as issues rather than pull requests; maintainers handle design and implementation through a prompt-driven workflow. See
CONTRIBUTING.md.Thanks for taking the time to report it.