Skip to content

Sync Endpoints DRAFT#2

Open
jpdevries wants to merge 5 commits intomodxcms:masterfrom
jpdevries:sync-endpoints
Open

Sync Endpoints DRAFT#2
jpdevries wants to merge 5 commits intomodxcms:masterfrom
jpdevries:sync-endpoints

Conversation

@jpdevries
Copy link
Collaborator

@jpdevries jpdevries commented Nov 3, 2016

View Markdown preview online

Voting

Only MODX Board Members may cast a vote. The Chief Architect and Chief Maintainer of the MODX Leadership are also granted one vote each. Votes may not be edited after they have been cast.

More info can be found in the voting protocol.

@Mark-H Mark-H added the Draft label Nov 24, 2016
@jpdevries jpdevries changed the title Sync Endpoints DRAFT Progressive Manager DRAFT May 22, 2017
@jpdevries
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Wordpress is starting to "pick a JavaScript framework" for their Manager. 🙄

I think if we can find a way to be all MODX about it, and enhance our Manager in a more decoupled and abstract way, it would continue to set us apart from the mold
https://wptavern.com/wordpress-to-select-new-javascript-framework-for-use-in-core

That's part of what this DRAFT is trying to do, allow the MODX core to be pliable and semantic, and decouple the enhancement layers so that the front end interface and the back end can mature at their own rates. If the "default theme" needs to switch to another JavaScript framework and/or make breaking changes, it shouldn't have to wait for an eclipse to do so.

@jpdevries
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Originally this was a synchronous endpoints DRAFT. It evolved into a progressive manager DRAFT, introducing the idea of not "shipping JS frameworks" with the "core". I'm thinking of reverting it back to just being a synchronous endpoints DRAFT

@jpdevries jpdevries changed the title Progressive Manager DRAFT Sync Endpoints DRAFT Jul 1, 2017
@jpdevries
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Did some much needed editing, labeled Please review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants