Skip to content
43 changes: 43 additions & 0 deletions doc/contributing/advocacy-ambassador-program.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -165,3 +165,46 @@ Some of the things to highlight include:
#### Project contacts

* @mhdawson

### How things get done in the Node.js project

#### Goal

Help people understand that no people are paid to answer their issues or
implement their pull requests. Things get done based on what volunteers work on
and the best way to get something fixed/changed is to submit a Pull request.

Some of the things to highlight include:

* Nobody is paid specifically to answer issues or implement features.
Comment thread
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
* No company owns/supports Node.js. Most contributions are from individuals
as opposed to organizations.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps worth expanding here: Even if a company does pay their employee to contribute to Node.js, all contributions are individual. Meaning, that once an individual receives a commit bit, that belongs to the individual and not the company. If they change employers their status does not change and granting the commit bit to the individual grants no rights in the project to the company. Just not sure how to say that succinctly.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jasnell, thanks for the suggestion, added some words, let me know if that is what you had in mind.

* The governance of the project is specifically designed to prevent one or
a small number of companies from dominating the project.
* Decisions are made by the active collaborators, there is no single person
who makes a decision for the project on their own. This can slow down
decision making but most often results in better outcomes.
* The project is open and receptive to contributions. If you need something PR
in a fix or feature.
* Maintainers are people just like you, with many priorities and and goals. We
Comment thread
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
all have the same goal of moving the Node.js project forward but at the same
time we all have other responsibilities that affect how much time we have
available to do so.
* People are volunteering their time to review your PRs and answer questions in
the issues you open. Be mindfull of your asks for their time and acknowledge
the gift of their time.
Comment thread
jasnell marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
* While volunteers work to do the right thing for the community, the project
does not owe anybody anything and does not tolerate abusive or
demanding language in issues, discussionis or PRs. A respectful diaglog will
Comment thread
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
maximize the chances of the outcome you desire.
* If you depend on timely support or an SLA, contract with a company that provides
paid support and will prioritize your issues.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated but important: We should highlight who to contact if a company has a bug and actually needs a support contract.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@mhdawson mhdawson Dec 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mcollina I agree, but I think we should defer adding a list of companies that will provide support in a follow on PR as I think that might be a more complicated discussion.


#### Related Links

* <https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/blob/main/TSC-Charter.md#section-3-establishment-of-the-tsc>

#### Project contacts

* @mcollina
* @mhdawson
Comment thread
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.
Comment thread
mhdawson marked this conversation as resolved.