Skip to content

feat(providers): telegram chat provider#9586

Closed
artemszelenov wants to merge 2 commits into
novuhq:nextfrom
artemszelenov:telegram-chat-provider
Closed

feat(providers): telegram chat provider#9586
artemszelenov wants to merge 2 commits into
novuhq:nextfrom
artemszelenov:telegram-chat-provider

Conversation

@artemszelenov

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What changed? Why was the change needed?

Added support for telegram chat provider.

Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 20 49 07 Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 20 48 50
Expand for optional sections

Special notes for your reviewer

I would like to get rid of getting telegramChatId from endpoint.url option, but now it only works when I set webhookUrl credential to subscriber where I put telegramChatId.

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👷 Deploy request for dashboard-v2-novu-staging pending review.

Visit the deploys page to approve it

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2bf710d

@artemszelenov artemszelenov changed the title Telegram chat provider feat: telegram chat provider Dec 2, 2025
@artemszelenov artemszelenov changed the title feat: telegram chat provider feat(providers): telegram chat provider Dec 2, 2025
@a1kudryavtsev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Great job! Waiting for the release

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is being marked as stale due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the stale Pull Request that needs to be reviewed label Mar 29, 2026
@chrisvasey

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Are there any plans to add Telegram support? This PR has been open for a long time

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the stale Pull Request that needs to be reviewed label Apr 8, 2026
@scopsy

scopsy commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Telegram support was added in #11112 and will be available in the next minor release 🙏

@scopsy scopsy closed this May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants