Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I don't have a general answer to context specific symbols, but in this case it would be OK to define LT as a function, as that won't interfere with its CLISP definition. When you do ED(LT) you're asking it to edit some definition, and since it has a property list ED goes ahead with that. You can do ED(LT FNS) and since it does not (yet) have a FNS definition it will ask if you want a LAMBDA or NLAMBDA dummy definition. Go ahead and give it the expected definition. Once it has both a FNS and a PROPERTY-LIST definition, if you don't ask to edit a particular one (e.g., you do ED(LT) rather than ED(LT FNS)) it will ask which definition to edit. Type enough to disambiguate the types presented.

Replies: 5 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by RyanBurnside
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@RyanBurnside
Comment options

@nbriggs
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
4 participants