You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Bug]: hardcoded timeouts for SSH environment lead to hard-to-recover-from "did not respond during connection setup" error. #32572
I searched existing issues and did not find a duplicate.
I included enough detail to reproduce or investigate the problem.
Area
apps/desktop
Steps to reproduce
work with a SSH environment
the remote host is not the most powerful machine, codex started a couple of subagents scanning various folders
remote server took couple secs
End result:
T3 Code connection to xxx: T3 Code on xxx did not answer
The host is fine, possibly slow.
Expected behavior
Ideally, I can configure the timeout per environment. Setting timeouts to 10 min would solve the issue with the particular slow host.
I don't need to see the output during the job, provided that: (1) the job gets done on the remote, and (2) the response arrives at some point for me to check.
Actual behavior
T3 Code connection to xxx: T3 Code on xxx did not answer
This device: not checked
T3 Code on xxx: FAILED
Cause: timeout
Attempts: 2
Route: Direct
App version: 0.1.7
Host version: 0.1.7
Error: xxx did not respond during connection setup.
Subsequent manual reconnects end the same way. To reconnect, remove the env, but without proper cleanup, it fails to re-add the env and gets stuck on "adding".
Impact
Major degradation or frequent failure
Version or commit
0.1.7
Environment
macOS 27.0.1 (26A434) -> debian stable, VM
Logs or stack traces
Screenshots, recordings, or supporting files
No response
Workaround
The only functional workaround in T3 code seems to be removing and re-adding the environment, often paired with rm -rf ~/.t3 on the remote host.
Thanks for writing this up. It asks for new behaviour rather than reporting a defect, so it does not belong in the bug tracker and I'm closing it as not planned here. Feature ideas are discussed in Discussions: please post it there.
Activity
juliusmarminge commentedon Nov 12, 2026
Thanks for writing this up. It asks for new behaviour rather than reporting a defect, so it does not belong in the bug tracker and I'm closing it as not planned here. Feature ideas are discussed in Discussions: please post it there.