v5

[JounQin]

• drop node 14 and 16 - Should we follow prettier's version strategy? https://app.unpkg.com/prettier@3.5.3/files/package.json#L139 cc @fisker
• migrate to ESM as primary dual package
• change to named export style
• don't export "./*": "./lib/*.js"
• use async and batch stage commands - feat!: use async and batch stage commands #208

[fisker]

Should we follow prettier's version strategy?

My opinion is to drop EOL version, >=20.

migrate to ESM as primary dual package

I prefer ESM only.

[JounQin]

My opinion is to drop EOL version, >=20.

I prefer ESM only.

When will prettier do that?

[fisker]

When will prettier do that?

We don't know yet, but I don't think it's necessary to align with Prettier.

[JounQin]

ESM only is a bit difficult to jump to due to mock-fs usage on my testing, I haven't found great alternatives yet, so I'll stick on dual package at least during current prototyping. So dropping <20 is not in emergency.