Fix: allow unlimited results for question:* taglocations search

[krupali-narania]

This PR updates the taglocations search behavior to return all results when the tag query is question:*, ensuring complete result sets instead of being limited.

Related to taglocations search behavior for question:*

Make sure these boxes are checked before your pull request (PR) is ready to be reviewed and merged. Thanks!

• PR is descriptively titled 📑 and links the original issue above 🔗
• tests pass -- look for a green checkbox ✔️ a few minutes after opening your PR -- or run tests locally with rake test
• code is in uniquely-named feature branch and has no merge conflicts 📁
• screenshots/GIFs are attached 📎 in case of UI updation
• ask @publiclab/reviewers for help

@publiclab/reviewers
Hi! This is my first contribution to Public Lab.
This PR updates the taglocations search to return all results for question:*.
Please let me know if any changes or improvements are needed — happy to iterate.
Thank you!

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this pull request! This space is protected by our Code of Conduct - and we're here to help.
Dangerbot will test out your code and reply in a bit with some pointers and requests.
Also please refer here for installation help 💿
There may be some errors, but don't worry! We'll work through them with you! 👍🎉😄


One thing that can help to get started is to make sure you've included a link back to the original issue you're solving, in the format fixes #0000 (for example). And to make sure the PR title describes what you're trying to do! (often it can be the same as the issue title) Thanks! 🙌


Then, you can say hello in our chatroom & share a link to this PR to get a review! 👋 ✅

[krupali-narania]

Hi! Thank you for the warm welcome 😊 This PR is based on the discussion around improving `taglocations` behavior for `question:*`. There wasn’t an existing issue created for this, but I’m happy to link one or update the PR if needed. Please let me know if you’d like me to open an issue and reference it here. Thanks!

…

On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 at 23:49, welcome[bot] ***@***.***> wrote: *welcome[bot]* left a comment (publiclab/plots2#11848) <#11848 (comment)> Thanks for opening this pull request! This space is protected by our Code of Conduct <https://publiclab.org/conduct> - and we're here to help. Dangerbot will test out your code and reply in a bit with some pointers and requests. Also please refer here <#3840> for installation help 💿 There may be some errors, *but don't worry!* We'll work through them with you! 👍🎉😄 One thing that can help to get started is to make sure you've included a link back to the original issue you're solving, in the format fixes #0000 (for example). And to make sure the PR title describes what you're trying to do! (often it can be the same as the issue title) Thanks! 🙌 Then, you can say hello in our chatroom <https://gitter.im/publiclab/publiclab> & share a link to this PR to get a review! 👋 ✅ — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#11848 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BJVXIT4L7MIGFEJBRHDVWO34HJ4JXAVCNFSM6AAAAACSAVDH46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTONRUGE3TSNZWGM> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>