refactor(workflow): add Jinja2 renderer abstraction for template transform#16
Conversation
…de and threaded it through DifyNodeFactory so TemplateTransform nodes receive the dependency by default, keeping behavior unchanged unless an override is provided. Changes are in `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node.py` and `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`. **Commits** - chore(workflow): identify TemplateTransform dependency on CodeExecutor - feat(workflow): add CodeExecutor constructor injection to TemplateTransformNode (defaulting to current behavior) - feat(workflow): inject CodeExecutor from DifyNodeFactory when creating TemplateTransform nodes **Tests** - Not run (not requested) Next step: run `make lint` and `make type-check` if you want to validate the backend checks.
…Transform to use it, keeping CodeExecutor as the default adapter while preserving current behavior. Updates are in `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_renderer.py`, `api/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node.py`, `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`, and `api/tests/unit_tests/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node_spec.py`. Commit-style summary: - feat(template-transform): add Jinja2 template renderer abstraction with CodeExecutor adapter - refactor(template-transform): use renderer in node/factory and update unit test patches Tests not run (not requested).
…ode creation to return TemplateTransformNode directly for template-transform nodes in `api/core/workflow/nodes/node_factory.py`. Commit-style summary: - refactor(template-transform): derive TemplateRenderError from ValueError - refactor(node-factory): instantiate TemplateTransformNode directly with injected renderer Tests not run (not requested).
…ts/core/workflow/nodes/template_transform/template_transform_node_spec.py`) chore(type-check): ran `make type-check` (basedpyright clean, 0 errors) No errors reported.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
2 participants
Benchmark PR from qodo-benchmark#433