Skip to content

Should we add an accessor for integer64? #312

Description

@lacyhamilton

Should we add an accessor for integer64?

#define INTEGER64(x) ((int64_t *) REAL(x))
#define INTEGER64_RO(x) ((const int64_t *) REAL_RO(x))

Referencing #7618 (link) in {data.table} repository.

We are a group of students working on this issue in {data.table} for our NAU Open-Source project and have the accessor working in the {data.table} library. We are wondering if this would be better to add here instead?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions