Skip to content

company-lsp example: is it still appropriate/relevant? #160

@rdiaz02

Description

@rdiaz02

In https://github.com/radian-software/prescient.el#for-company we are told:

"By customizing this user option to nil for such Company backends (see Radian for an example)"

and the example code uses company-lsp, but company-lsp is no longer supported : https://emacs-lsp.github.io/lsp-mode/#overview " (note that company-lsp is no longer supported)." Also tigersoldier/company-lsp#145 (comment) (from LSP developer, August 2020).

So I wonder if:

  1. The problem is still present (does not seem so in my very limited testing with only a few languages)
  2. If the problem should be addressed via a package that is no longer supported.

(Note: this is strongly related to similar comments in radian-software/radian#535)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions