[LazyBlock] Allows using complex expressions with configuration#1931
Merged
Conversation
dblock
requested changes
Nov 14, 2019
Member
|
👍 |
Member
|
Merged |
basjanssen
pushed a commit
to basjanssen/grape
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2020
…-grape#1931) * Introduces the concept of a LazyBlock which gets excecuted on mount * Fixes LazyBlock within a namespace * Adds more specs so that given can also be used for conditional lazy blocks * Documents expressions * Adds a changelog * Update README.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is motivated by a bug I've introduced on our system.
The problem, when you are trying to waterfall a configuration, is that
LazyValuedoesn't play nicely inside an expression so this codeIs evaluated when the class is load as: configuration[:attribute] => LazyValue || 'default_value' => LazyValue
Which means that even when you mount the API with
attribute: nilthe value will equalnilrather than'default_value'as a developer might expect.To mitigate this, I've introduced a lazy block, so you are able to put that expression within a
mountedblock which will only be evaluated when the API is mounted, and furthermore, will prevent methods using the response of the expression to running before the API is mounted