Merged
Conversation
The `rust-call` ABI isn't compatible with `#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]`, so trying to use that feature with closures leads to an ICE (rust-lang#67981). This turns that ICE into a type-check error.
…ckh726 Don't ICE on return-type notation when promoting trait preds to associated type bounds Fixes rust-lang#111846
…compiler-errors Always require closure parameters to be `Sized` The `rust-call` ABI isn't compatible with `#![feature(unsized_fn_params)]`, so trying to use that feature with closures leads to an ICE (rust-lang#67981). This turns that ICE into a type-check error. `@rustbot` label A-closures F-unsized_fn_params
…r=compiler-errors Rename `traits_in_crate` query to `traits` > NOTE: Not named just `traits` due to a naming conflict. This can, in fact, be easily avoided.
…-env, r=jackh726 Don't ICE when computing PointerLike trait when region vars are in param-env Fixes rust-lang#111877
…er-errors Add regression tests for pretty-printing inherent projections Tests for rust-lang#111486. Fixes rust-lang#111879. r? `@matthiaskrgr`
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR: previous master: 9d826e01e8 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (82faf5e): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 647.507s -> 647.271s (-0.04%) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Sized#111864 (Always require closure parameters to beSized)traits_in_cratequery totraits#111870 (Renametraits_in_cratequery totraits)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup