coverage: Multiple small tweaks to counter creation#131325
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 7, 2024
Merged
coverage: Multiple small tweaks to counter creation#131325bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
This makes it possible for other parts of counter-assignment to check whether a node is guaranteed to end up with some kind of counter. Switching from `impl Fn` to a concrete `&BitSet` just avoids the hassle of trying to store a closure in a struct field, and currently there's no foreseeable need for this information to not be a bitset.
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
Swatinem
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2024
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128399 (liballoc: introduce String, Vec const-slicing) - rust-lang#131308 (enable f16 and f128 on windows-gnullvm targets) - rust-lang#131325 (coverage: Multiple small tweaks to counter creation) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#131325 - Zalathar:tweak-counters, r=jieyouxu coverage: Multiple small tweaks to counter creation I've been experimenting with some larger changes to how coverage counters are assigned to parts of the control-flow graph, and while none of that is ready yet, along the way I've repeatedly found myself wanting these smaller tweaks as a base. There are no changes to compiler output.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been experimenting with some larger changes to how coverage counters are assigned to parts of the control-flow graph, and while none of that is ready yet, along the way I've repeatedly found myself wanting these smaller tweaks as a base.
There are no changes to compiler output.