Enable file locking support for Hurd#150058
Conversation
|
(marked as draft for now because my test build of 1.91.1 with this backported is still running, and I want to ensure it works as expected end-to-end before it gets merged!) |
|
Thanks for the fix. This obviously seems fine if it fixes the issue, which you will know better, so, r=me after you verify. r? @workingjubilee |
|
✌️ @Fabian-Gruenbichler, you can now approve this pull request! If @workingjubilee told you to " |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
bors r=@workingjubilee |
|
can confirm that building 1.91.1 with a backport of this and |
|
@bors delegate- @Fabian-Gruenbichler Need the @ first, but also please move the issue/PR numbers in the git commit comments into the PR description, as requested by the bot. ( I think GitHub fixed that for notifications but I don't remember if they fixed it for issue pingbacks... ) |
|
whoops, misdescribed what the bot requested. read the text, jubilee!!! |
|
sorry, I misread the bot messages as well (both the review and the no issue references ones). will clean this up shortly! |
like Illumos and AIX, Hurd was missed when originally introducing locking gates per target OS. building rustc on Hurd was broken as a result since 1.91. Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
d78bf36 to
e318527
Compare
|
@Fabian-Gruenbichler: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: Not in reviewers |
|
@bors r+ |
|
@bors rollup |
…uwer Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - #150058 (Enable file locking support for Hurd) - #150420 (Do not spill operand debuginfo to stack for AArch64 SVE predicates `<vscale x N x i1>` where `N != 16`) - #150501 (Fix Typos in Platform Support Tables) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
like Illumos (#148322) and aix (#148619), Hurd was missed when originally
introducing locking gates per target OS in #132977. building rustc on Hurd was
broken as a result since 1.91.