Point at unmet explicit lifetime obligation bound

[estebank]

r? @oli-obk

Split off of #85799.

[estebank]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 9b7a28301167cbab9775d6c123d485fbe5ca7d63 with merge 9662333cd6d966baf684fd71269ef0e737587bc3...

[estebank]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit e5d42af with merge 5f55d1bdbcbb69bceac56f9723fa76632d134fee...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 5f55d1bdbcbb69bceac56f9723fa76632d134fee (5f55d1bdbcbb69bceac56f9723fa76632d134fee)

[rust-timer]

Queued 5f55d1bdbcbb69bceac56f9723fa76632d134fee with parent 7069a8c, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking try commit (5f55d1bdbcbb69bceac56f9723fa76632d134fee): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any significant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

[oli-obk]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit e5d42af has been approved by oli-obk

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e5d42af with merge f63ab6c...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: oli-obk
Pushing f63ab6c to master...