x86: crate finally builds with x86 and x86_64#29
Merged
phil-opp merged 5 commits intorust-osdev:masterfrom Aug 4, 2023
Merged
Conversation
e9e8ce9 to
5a119f1
Compare
Member
|
Thanks for the PR! Could you
Could you give some more details on this? |
Member
Author
phil-opp
approved these changes
Aug 4, 2023
Member
phil-opp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense, thanks! Sorry for the slow review.
Member
|
Published as v0.3.0. (This should be a non-breaking change. I still decided to do a new minor release in case there are some subtle differences in the API.) |
phil-opp
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 4, 2023
Member
Author
|
Nice, thanks for merging this! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This PR enables to actually use the crate with arch
x86and not justx86_64. I added CI steps to verify the build. It is a follow up to #28. I had to remove thex86_64dependency as it broke the build.Unfortunately, I had to remove your nice and convenient port abstraction from the
x86_64crate. As the ports are an internal API and not exposed to users, I think this is fine. However, it was not my intention to remove any of your work.. perhaps, you might have an idea for another/better solution?