docs: inconsistent "Form requirement validator" example

[ogix]

On which page do you see this issue?

https://daisyui.com/components/validator/

Describe the issue

In "Form requirement validator" example email is wrapped with fieldset element and password is wrapped with label element. It should probably use label for both but I wonder if using fieldset class is still correct.

<form class="fieldset bg-base-200 border-base-300 rounded-box w-xs border p-4">
  <fieldset class="fieldset">
    <label class="label">Email</label>
    <input type="email" class="input validator" placeholder="Email" required />
    <p class="validator-hint hidden">Required</p>
  </fieldset>

  <label class="fieldset">
    <span class="label">Password</span>
    <input type="password" class="input validator" placeholder="Password" required />
    <span class="validator-hint hidden">Required</span>
  </label>

  <button class="btn btn-neutral mt-4" type="submit">Login</button>
  <button class="btn btn-ghost mt-1" type="reset">Reset</button>
</form>

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

[github-actions]

Thank you @ogix for reporting issues. It helps daisyUI a lot 💚
I'll be working on issues one by one. I will help with this one as soon as a I find a solution.
In the meantime providing more details and reproduction links would be helpful.

[pdanpdan]

It is like that exactly to demonstrate 2 type of usage.

[ogix]

But semantically fieldset should be used to group fields and shouldn't be used for each field.

[pdanpdan]

Do you have an official source for that? Just for me to know.
It doesn't change anything, because that is an example on how to use validator when inside fieldset

[ogix]

For example here: https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-author-20110809/the-fieldset-element.html that says:

"The fieldset element represents a set of form controls optionally grouped under a common name."

And there is no example that shows fieldset with one field.

[pdanpdan]

A set of includes: empty set, 1 element set, 2 elements set, ... :)
I agree that it is more common to mean more than one, but the semantics do not exclude the case of one - the only semantic meaning is that they belong together.

[ogix]

Yes, but IMO it feels unnatural to use fieldsets for such cases.

Actually I found other related issue here: #3573 so maybe discussion should be continued there.

This issue was originally regarding inconsistent examples. Still I am not sure if it is good idea two show two different solutions without any hint.

[pdanpdan]

I agree with the hint part. And I mostly agree with the fact that it would not be recommended to group one field in a fieldset, but it is valid html and it conforms to the specification, and it happens in real world.