Skip to content

chore(doc):SP-4029 update scanoss_settings_schema.rst with scan tunni…#183

Merged
agustingroh merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/SP-4029-update-scanoss-settings-schema-doc
Feb 9, 2026
Merged

chore(doc):SP-4029 update scanoss_settings_schema.rst with scan tunni…#183
agustingroh merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/SP-4029-update-scanoss-settings-schema-doc

Conversation

@agustingroh
Copy link
Contributor

@agustingroh agustingroh commented Feb 9, 2026

…ng parameters

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added documentation for scan tuning parameters with detailed descriptions, default values, and configuration options for snippet matching optimization.
    • Included practical example configurations and extended the complete example JSON demonstrating file_snippet block usage in scanoss.json settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates added a new "Scan Tuning Parameters" section describing snippet matching configuration options for the scanoss.json settings file, including parameter definitions, types, defaults, and usage examples.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation - Scan Tuning Parameters
docs/source/scanoss_settings_schema.rst
Added new "Scan Tuning Parameters" section with table describing min_snippet_hits, min_snippet_lines, ranking_enabled, ranking_threshold, and honour_file_exts parameters. Included file_snippet block configuration example and extended the complete example JSON to demonstrate the new settings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A documentation hop, so neat and bright,
With tuning parameters now in sight!
The snippet matching guide takes flight,
Configuration examples shining light,
SCANOSS settings documented right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly indicates the PR updates documentation with scan tuning parameters, which aligns with the main changeset that adds a 'Scan Tuning Parameters' section to the scanoss_settings_schema.rst file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/SP-4029-update-scanoss-settings-schema-doc

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2026

SCANOSS SCAN Completed 🚀

  • Detected components: 3
  • Undeclared components: 0
  • Declared components: 3
  • Detected files: 106
  • Detected files undeclared: 0
  • Detected files declared: 106
  • Licenses detected: 2
  • Licenses detected with copyleft: 1
  • Policies: ✅ 1 pass (1 total)

View more details on SCANOSS Action Summary

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/source/scanoss_settings_schema.rst (1)

29-31: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Update the “settings” description to include scan tuning.

The text says settings only controls skip, but the new file_snippet section adds tuning options. Please revise this paragraph to mention both skip and file_snippet.

@agustingroh agustingroh merged commit f0ccd9b into main Feb 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@agustingroh agustingroh deleted the chore/SP-4029-update-scanoss-settings-schema-doc branch February 9, 2026 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant