Skip to content

feature: windows tray support - #74

Merged
Dumbris merged 3 commits into
smart-mcp-proxy:mainfrom
DarkGenius:feature/windows-tray-support
Oct 23, 2025
Merged

Dumbris merged 3 commits into
smart-mcp-proxy:mainfrom
DarkGenius:feature/windows-tray-support

Conversation

@DarkGenius

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds Windows support for the mcpproxy-tray application, enabling system tray functionality on Windows platforms.

Changes Made

  • Build System: Extended build tags from darwin to (darwin || windows) for tray components
  • Process Monitoring: Added Windows-specific process monitoring (process_windows.go) with proper exit code handling
  • Cross-platform UI: Made OpenWebUI work on both macOS and Windows using appropriate system calls
  • Binary Resolution: Fixed executable detection for Windows .exe files
  • Port Conflict Resolution: Added automatic port selection when default port is unavailable

@DarkGenius DarkGenius changed the title Feature/windows tray support feature: windows tray support Oct 12, 2025
@Dumbris

Dumbris commented Oct 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey, @DarkGenius thank you for your contribution!
Could you rebase your PR branch on latest main? I have fixed e2e tests and pr-build workflows.

Previously, stderr monitoring started only after successful MCP initialize() handshake. This caused startup errors (like missing API keys or credentials) to be invisible in logs when initialization timed out.

Now stderr monitoring begins immediately after process start, before the initialize() call. This ensures all process output is captured and logged, making debugging connection failures much easier.
@DarkGenius
DarkGenius force-pushed the feature/windows-tray-support branch from a5d8b46 to c3a3e41 Compare October 22, 2025 06:41
- Extend build tags to support Windows (darwin || windows)
- Add Windows-specific process monitoring (process_windows.go)
- Implement cross-platform OpenWebUI with Windows support
- Update binary resolution for .exe files on Windows
- Add automatic port conflict resolution
@DarkGenius
DarkGenius force-pushed the feature/windows-tray-support branch from c3a3e41 to a64e289 Compare October 22, 2025 07:05

@Dumbris Dumbris left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a ton for this update!

@Dumbris
Dumbris merged commit 83f0f25 into smart-mcp-proxy:main Oct 23, 2025
Dumbris added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2026
…und 3

All four verified against GitHub and the tree before applying.

1. windows-tray: "no Windows-tray PR is open or merged" was false. #74
   ("feature: windows tray support") merged 2025-10-23 and the cross-platform
   Go/systray build still ships on Windows. The claim now scopes to what the
   epic actually tracks — the native WebView2 replacement — for which no PR
   exists and native/windows/ is a README placeholder.

2. analytics-dashboard: "can never tick from code" conflated two things. A
   human can run spec 069's T023 Playwright sweep and tick the box; what can
   never exist is code evidence for it. Reworded so the distinction is explicit.

3. hygiene-spec-gardener: "three gardener runs ... auto-approved by #842" was
   wrong. Only #999 carries a github-actions APPROVED review. #824 has none and
   merged ~24 minutes BEFORE the auto-approve workflow landed; #870 records no
   approving review either.

4. token-bench-public: calling the MCP-specific third "integrated" overstated
   completion. ToolRet and LiveMCPTool are static retrieval/token corpora and
   lap-score is a linter — none is a public agent-loop task suite, which is what
   the task ultimately owes.

Also noted for the record: the linux-arm64 Build Binaries failure on the
previous commit is a flaky test, not a regression from this docs-only change.
TestServiceStartScanDeepOnRunsSourceResolutionAndPass2
(internal/security/scanner) passes locally with -count=3, and two runs of this
same branch four minutes apart — 33360429077 and 33360648947, both docs-only —
disagreed on it.
Dumbris added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2026
…ithub warnings (#1136)

* chore(roadmap): truth-sync statuses against code, clear all --check-github warnings

An evidence-based re-derivation of every non-done roadmap.yaml leaf. Each flip
below was verified against the tree, git/gh state and the rendering sites, then
independently re-checked by an adversarial pass; claims that did not survive
that pass were dropped rather than applied.

Statuses that were wrong in the "already shipped" direction:
- upgrade-nudge-delta todo -> done (#1085, closes #1081). The note asserted
  TODO(spec-079/FR-002) markers exist and that the checker calls only
  /releases/latest; both are false. internal/updatecheck/delta.go now computes
  the delta and all six surfaces render it.
- upgrade-nudge epic in_progress -> done (all five tasks now done).
- analytics-dashboard in_progress -> done. Both children shipped; the
  default-landing half is live (router '/' -> Dashboard, guarded by
  dashboard-default-landing.spec.ts). Spec 069's one open task is a local
  Playwright sweep that leaves no artifact and can never tick from code.
- discovery-eval-harness todo -> done. Both halves ship: cmd/scan-eval for
  security recall/FP, and the eval.yml retrieval-d1 gate plus bench/'s own
  RecallAtK/NDCGAtK + recall@5 parity gate for discovery quality.
- hygiene-spec-gardener in_progress -> done (#824, #870, #999, #842). Its
  recorded blocker is cleared: check-spec-evidence.py is on main.

Statuses that were wrong in the "claimed progress it does not have" direction:
- windows-tray and windows-tray-window in_review -> todo. No Windows-tray PR is
  open or merged and native/windows/ is a README placeholder, so "in review"
  pointed at nothing. The section header is renamed to match.
- planning-hygiene todo -> in_progress and action-log-transparency todo ->
  in_progress; both already have done children.

Notes corrected where they would misdirect the next implementer:
- token-bench-harness claimed it absorbs discovery-eval-harness by measuring
  retrieval recall. Recall is already measured, and bench/ already covers token
  counting, encoding arms (incl. direct_deferred), break-even and reporting.
  The note now records what is genuinely open: activity-log session replay,
  measured first-call success/retry rate, and tokens-per-successful-task.
- token-bench-public: the MCP-specific third already ships via spec 083
  (ToolRet, LiveMCPBench snapshot, lap-score); only agent-loop suites remain.

specs/098-tools-preflight/tasks.md: tick T001, T024, T031, each confirmed
against the tree (doc.go states both invariants T001 requires;
toolslist_snapshot_test.go is labelled T024 and green; README carries all three
FR-017 examples). T025/T027/T032/T033 are left unchecked — they are one-time
process acts or did not survive verification.

Deliberately NOT changed: no epics were added for shipped specs (084-100).
roadmap.yaml is the working set by design and ROADMAP.md already renders a
generated per-spec progress table, so absence of an epic is not drift.

scripts/gen-roadmap.py --check-github: 3 warnings -> 0 errors, 0 warnings.

* fix(roadmap): correct six claims flagged by cross-model review

All six findings from the opencode gpt-5.6-sol review were independently
re-verified against the tree before being applied; none were false positives.
(The reviewer's initial claim that spec-gardener-auto-approve.yml is missing
WAS a false positive from its glob tool and it self-corrected — the file exists
at .github/workflows/spec-gardener-auto-approve.yml.)

1. Un-tick specs/098 T024. T024 asks for a golden snapshot test proving
   tools/list is BYTE-IDENTICAL across all three modes. Spec 099 (FR-014/015)
   later converted that test from a no-delta gate into an ENUMERATED-delta gate
   (toolsListAllowedDelta permits describe_tool and quarantine_security to
   move), so at HEAD the test no longer demonstrates the property T024 states.
   It may well have held on 098's own branch, but that is not checkable from
   the tree, and an unverifiable tick is exactly what this PR exists to remove.
   Badge 29/33 -> 28/33.

2. discovery-eval-harness note: drop the "SUPERSEDED — folded into
   token-bench-harness" framing. It contradicted itself once the epic was
   marked done — token-bench-harness is still unbuilt, so nothing could have
   been folded into it. Both halves shipped independently.

3. Same note: the eval.yml retrieval-d1 job is REPORT-ONLY on pull requests
   (continue-on-error, guarding against npx/uvx fetch flake) and blocks only on
   the nightly schedule. Promoting it to PR-blocking is still open (MCP-742).

4. Same note: the SC-003 recall@5 = 0.68 +/- 0.05 parity gate is asserted in
   bench/armindex_test.go, not armindex.go — the latter supplies the production
   index wiring, not the assertion.

5. token-bench-harness note: the literature-derived retry defaults live in
   bench/session.go (armRetryRates, research D8). bench/report.go only renders
   and labels them as estimates. The substantive point stands: retry rates are
   assumed, not observed.

6. token-bench-public note: "CI-wired" overstated the LiveMCPBench snapshot.
   bench.yml's regular job passes only -corpus-v2; the snapshot is runnable via
   -livemcptool but not run in CI, and its loader has no retrieval golden set,
   so it measures token/scale rather than recall. ToolRet does have its own
   bench.yml job.

gen-roadmap.py --check and --check-github both still clean.

* fix(roadmap): tighten two claims from cross-model review round 2

Both findings verified against the tree before applying.

1. The retrieval-D1 blocking scope was stated too narrowly. eval.yml sets
   continue-on-error only for github.event_name == 'pull_request', and the
   workflow triggers on pull_request, workflow_dispatch and schedule — so the
   job is report-only on PRs and BLOCKING on both nightly and manual dispatch
   runs, not "only on the nightly schedule". The note now says so, and records
   that the workflow's own inline comment carries the same omission.

2. discovery-eval-harness is now done but still declared
   depends_on: [token-bench-harness], which is unbuilt — a done node cannot
   depend on an open one, and the edge contradicted the corrected note saying
   both halves shipped independently. Edge removed; the id remains a valid
   depends_on target for anything that needs it.

gen-roadmap.py --check and --check-github both clean.

* fix(roadmap): scope four over-broad claims from cross-model review round 3

All four verified against GitHub and the tree before applying.

1. windows-tray: "no Windows-tray PR is open or merged" was false. #74
   ("feature: windows tray support") merged 2025-10-23 and the cross-platform
   Go/systray build still ships on Windows. The claim now scopes to what the
   epic actually tracks — the native WebView2 replacement — for which no PR
   exists and native/windows/ is a README placeholder.

2. analytics-dashboard: "can never tick from code" conflated two things. A
   human can run spec 069's T023 Playwright sweep and tick the box; what can
   never exist is code evidence for it. Reworded so the distinction is explicit.

3. hygiene-spec-gardener: "three gardener runs ... auto-approved by #842" was
   wrong. Only #999 carries a github-actions APPROVED review. #824 has none and
   merged ~24 minutes BEFORE the auto-approve workflow landed; #870 records no
   approving review either.

4. token-bench-public: calling the MCP-specific third "integrated" overstated
   completion. ToolRet and LiveMCPTool are static retrieval/token corpora and
   lap-score is a linter — none is a public agent-loop task suite, which is what
   the task ultimately owes.

Also noted for the record: the linux-arm64 Build Binaries failure on the
previous commit is a flaky test, not a regression from this docs-only change.
TestServiceStartScanDeepOnRunsSourceResolutionAndPass2
(internal/security/scanner) passes locally with -count=3, and two runs of this
same branch four minutes apart — 33360429077 and 33360648947, both docs-only —
disagreed on it.

* fix(roadmap): ToolRet is not MCP-specific (cross-model review round 4)

Verified: bench/corpusio/toolret.go documents ToolRet as a general
tool-retrieval corpus whose documentation fields are "heterogeneous JSON/text,
NOT MCP input schemas" (Schema stays nil). Grouping it under "the MCP-specific
third" was wrong.

The token-bench-public note now says public corpus/linter groundwork is
integrated while NO public agent-loop task suite is, and names the ToolRet
caveat explicitly so the next implementer does not re-inherit the error.

Round 4 found no other issues; the round-3 windows-tray, analytics T023 and
gardener corrections were all confirmed accurate against GitHub and the tree.

* fix(roadmap): discovery-eval-harness is in_progress, not done (review round 5)

The final review round caught an error in this PR's own flip, and it is the
same failure mode the PR was written to fix: an epic marked done while a
governing FR is unmet.

Spec 065 FR-009 and SC-005 require CI to FAIL on a discovery regression beyond
tolerance. The retrieval-D1 job sets continue-on-error for pull_request (D1
depends on npx/uvx fetches, a known flake source), so on the PR path CI does not
fail — and eval.yml's own comment records the promotion to PR-blocking as still
planned (MCP-742). The HARNESS shipped; the GATE did not.

Reverted to in_progress and added the remaining work as a child task
(discovery-eval-pr-blocking, MCP-742) so the epic's status has something in the
DAG to point at.

The reviewer also read CN-002 (frozen corpus, never live) as violated because D1
boots a live mcpproxy serving seven reference servers. Recorded as a weaker
tension to adjudicate rather than a violation: #931 pinned all seven upstreams
to freeze-era versions and the job gates on the exact corpus ID set, so the
corpus is reproducible in practice. Whether that satisfies CN-002 or a committed
snapshot is required is a judgement for the spec owner.

gen-roadmap.py --check and --check-github both clean (0 errors, 0 warnings).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants