Repository navigation
[3/5] Clarify progress state and task ordering names - #70
Merged
stromseng merged 1 commit intoSep 6, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Sep 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Distinguish the
ProgressStatedata object from theProgressStoreservice, and name ID/depth ordering entriesTaskOrderEntry. Rename task update, child insertion, and row construction functions to describe what they do.Export the new public type names and retain
TaskStoreandRenderRowas deprecated aliases. Update internal consumers and benchmarks without changing behavior.Stack 3/5. Base:
refactor/explicit-task-cleanup. Merge in order from 1 to 5.Validation:
bun run check(typecheck, lint, formatting, and Knip) andbun test(146 passing tests) at this layer.Previous: #69 · Next: #71