Skip to content

Disabling vulnerability analysis in IoP#4628

Merged
Lennonka merged 5 commits intotheforeman:masterfrom
Lennonka:disabling-vulnerability-iop
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

Disabling vulnerability analysis in IoP#4628
Lennonka merged 5 commits intotheforeman:masterfrom
Lennonka:disabling-vulnerability-iop

Conversation

@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Jan 30, 2026

What changes are you introducing?

Adding information about disabling (and reenabling) vulnerability analysis in IoP

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

New feature in IoP

SAT-41486

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into: N/A

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Jan 30, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Copy link
Member

@chris1984 chris1984 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, looks good from a tech point of view with Jeremy's feedback resolved.

@Lennonka Lennonka added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Feb 1, 2026
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added the Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author label Feb 1, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style-wise LGTM though I could not yet test it on nightly myself.

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Feb 2, 2026
@pr-processor pr-processor bot added Needs re-review and removed Waiting on contributor Requires an action from the author labels Feb 2, 2026
@Lennonka Lennonka removed the Waiting for code Requires merge of related code in another repository before it can be merged label Feb 10, 2026
Copy link

@synkd synkd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Testing completed, ACK from Satellite QE.

@Lennonka Lennonka added testing done No issues from the functional perspective and removed Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Feb 10, 2026
@Lennonka Lennonka merged commit 309db90 into theforeman:master Feb 12, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
@Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cherry picked:

@Lennonka Lennonka deleted the disabling-vulnerability-iop branch February 12, 2026 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective testing done No issues from the functional perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants