Skip to content

Clarify authentication for Ansible collection syncing#4660

Open
aneta-petrova wants to merge 4 commits intotheforeman:masterfrom
aneta-petrova:SAT-40367_auth-token
Open

Clarify authentication for Ansible collection syncing#4660
aneta-petrova wants to merge 4 commits intotheforeman:masterfrom
aneta-petrova:SAT-40367_auth-token

Conversation

@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member

What changes are you introducing?

  • Documenting the exact location of the auth token and SSO URL for syncing Ansible content from console.redhat.com
  • Distributing the new and existing information on authentication among prerequisites and additional resources

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-40367

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

N/A

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.18/Katello 4.20 (Satellite 6.19)
  • Foreman 3.17/Katello 4.19
  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18; orcharhino 7.6)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4; orcharhino 7.5)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.12.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Feb 18, 2026
@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova removed the Needs testing Requires functional testing label Feb 18, 2026
@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2026 13:11
Copy link
Contributor

@qcjames53 qcjames53 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The token fetch and SSO URL fetch steps are both valid, everything is clear and concise, and I see no grammar or spelling errors. Looking good to me!

Copy link
Contributor

@vsedmik vsedmik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, tested the steps with token and SSO URL work at Sat 6.19 to authenticate and sync the AC repo.

@aneta-petrova aneta-petrova added tech review done No issues from the technical perspective testing done No issues from the functional perspective and removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective labels Feb 18, 2026
@aneta-petrova
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @qcjames53 and @vsedmik!

Dear writers, can someone please check the style?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective tech review done No issues from the technical perspective testing done No issues from the functional perspective

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments