Created a README.

[Amaroq-Clearwater]

Disclaimer: The README in question is AI-generated, but it should still be reasonably accurate. You are welcome and encouraged to review it yourself.

[brliron]

The text part or the readme isn't too bad. The features section is a bit redundant with the sentence above it, the prerequisites section feels a bit weird because a Windows program working on wine is, well, that's the point of wine, and a C++ library for Win32 requiring a C++ compiler compatible with Win32 is a given. The example section says almost the same thing as the usage section. And the License section is an hallucination from the AI, this project doesn't have a license.

And then I checked smartdlg.hpp to see if the example code makes sense.

AI:

SmartDlg dlg(hDlg);

smartdlg.hpp:

namespace SmartDlg {

AI:

dlg.addControl(IDC_BUTTON1, SMARTDLG_ANCHOR_LEFT | SMARTDLG_ANCHOR_TOP);

smartdlg.hpp:
Ctrl+F addControl => 0 results.
Ctrl+F SMARTDLG_ANCHOR_LEFT -> 0 results.

This is worthless. Actually, it's a lot worse than worthless. Without a readme, you go to smartdlg.hpp to try to understand how it works. With a readme like this, you waste time trying to make it work, get weird errors that don't make sense, and after wasting a decent chunk of time on that, you either go read smartdlg.hpp or give up on this project - with the 2nd one being probably more likely.

Also, while looking for an example code I could look at for this section, I noticed that we actually never used this code. https://github.com/thpatch/thcrap/blob/940dcb3612fb1013fa360ab64ca22ffd331df14f/thcrap_update/src/self.cpp still has a comment saying "I want to make that into a reusable library" instead of actually using smartdlg.

[Amaroq-Clearwater]

Ah. So this example readme is no good, then…

Hopefully an official readme will be written at some point. Should I go ahead and close this PR?

[Amaroq-Clearwater]

I guess I'll find somebody to help me clean it up, and make it actually usable.