Parse scheme code properly

[turbopape]

As of now, I replace "problematic" scheme literals "#, @, etc..." using a dumb str replace. It would be nicer to have scheme parsed according to a proper scheme grammar and then use the generated structures for eval/apply. Maybe use instaparse?
Please head over to scheje.slack.com so we can discuss this further.

[emacstheviking]

Interested in helping but couldn't sign in to slack??! I've written lots of DCG parsers with Prolog for this and that and some parsers with Grako/Python. I am now using Clojure for my day job and looking to hone my skills elsewhere and this looks interesting as I have used scheme in the past as well. So, if you would like some assistance, here I am!
Thanks,
Sean.

[turbopape]

Hey, I would be more than happy to have you aboard!

You couldn't request a slack invite? Please share your email and I'll send
you an invite.
My email is: Rafik . Naccache @ Gmail . Com

Cheers,

Rafik

Le 8 oct. 2016 11:56 PM, "Sean Charles" notifications@github.com a écrit :

Interested in helping but couldn't sign in to slack??! I've written lots of
DCG parsers with Prolog for this and that parsers with Grako/Python. I am
now using Clojure for my day job and looking to hone my skills elsewhere
and this looks interesting as I have used scheme in the past as well. So,
if you would like some assistance, here I am!
Thanks,
Sean.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#4 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACpoH255cYckdicb3juzdtNDw4EXgRqwks5qyB-IgaJpZM4H0fq2
.

[turbopape]

Invite sent!