Remove warnings from CCPP physics#169
Merged
dustinswales merged 6 commits intoufs-community:ufs/devfrom Feb 23, 2024
Merged
Conversation
…bles not given an explicit value" warning. The following table provides justification for setting the variable to 0, it is how they are treated in other places. | file | line | description | |--------------------+------+-----------------------------| | ugwpv1_gsldrag.F90 | 521 | zlwb(:)= 0. ; zogw(:)=0. | | ugwp_driver_v0.F | 206 | zmtb(i) = 0.0 | | cires_ugwp.F90 | 297 | if (do_ugwp) zlwb(:) = 0. |
… drain_cpl and dsnow_cpl vars are changed from intent(out) to intent(in) variables. This is to replicate the rain_cpl and snow_cpl variables.
…out) variables. Variable err_message will report any errors in open and read statements
…eir related meta files
Qingfu-Liu
requested review from
dustinswales,
grantfirl and
mzhangw
as code owners
|
@Qingfu-Liu would you please create a UFS WM PR for this? |
Collaborator
|
Supercedes #149 |
grantfirl
approved these changes
Feb 20, 2024
Collaborator
|
@Qingfu-Liu @junwang-noaa I'll run RTs for this alone to verify behavior. Then, assuming no BL changes, I'd like to see it combined with #150, which also doesn't change BLs. |
Collaborator
|
OK, RTs are all successful. I'm going to ask Dom to combine this with #150 for final tests/merge. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@junwang-noaa and @grantfirl Since this PR#169 is merged to PR#150, I am not sure who should create a UFS WM PR for PR#150? |
|
@Qingfu-Liu I see Dom already created a ufs wm PR#2066. |
Collaborator
Author
|
@junwang-noaa Thanks for the information. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Most credit to @scrasmussen. @Qingfu-Liu removed some unneeded variables.
Description of Changes:
Changes to get rid of all the warnings, as pointed out in ufs-weather-model Issue#1984. The fixes for the second and third bullet points were intuited from how similar variables are treated in the code base, if different behavior is preferred please let me know!
For all the
warning #5462: Global name too long, shortened fromwarnings: this issue may be already fixed by the Intel compiler, per their message board. I haven't had access to the newer Intel 2024.0.1 or 2024.0.2 versions to test.The
drain_cplanddsnow_cplwarnings were "explicit INTENT(OUT) declaration is not given an explicit value". These variables are changed from intent(out) to intent(in) variables. This is to replicate the rain_cpl and snow_cpl variables.The
err_messagereturn value of two functions were not defined. The error message is defined as "" and if an error occurs in theopenandwritestatements it will return the error message. Note: this doesn't have the additionalerrflg, as stated in the coding rules, figure that would be an issue for a different PR if we want it fixed?The last remaining warning message still needs to be fixed. It is
FV3/ccpp/physics/physics/dcyc2t3.f(184): warning #6843: A dummy argument with an explicit INTENT(OUT) declaration is not given an explicit value. [ADJSFCULW]. This is only used in a print statement; removed [ADJSFCULW]Tests Conducted:
Testing on Derecho with Intel Fortran 2023.2.1. Result of testing is as follows:
Dependencies:
None
Documentation:
No changes.
Issue (optional):
Fixes most issues mentioned in ufs-weather-model Issue#1984.