Conversation
WalkthroughThe README.md documentation has been updated to replace generic or placeholder types with explicit PHP types in method signatures for the UTF8 class. A new method, Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @voku, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the project's README file. The update was performed by running the automated documentation generation script after ensuring the build environment had the latest version of the generator. The resulting changes in the README reflect recent code modifications, including the addition of a new method and more precise type hinting in existing method signatures within the documentation.
Highlights
- README Regeneration: The primary change is the regeneration of the
README.mdfile. This was done by updating the build process to use the latest readme generator and then running the generation script. - Documentation Updates: The regenerated README includes updated documentation, specifically refining parameter type hints for numerous methods (replacing generic
Ttypes with specificstring,array|object|string, etc.) and adding documentation for a newly introduced method,str_limit_in_byte.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README.md file, likely regenerated after a build process update. The changes primarily involve improving the specificity of type hints for function parameters and return values, which enhances the clarity of the API documentation. Overall, these are positive changes. I've identified a few areas where the generated documentation might not accurately reflect the underlying code's intent or could be made more consistent.
| **Parameters:** | ||
| - `string $str <p>INFO: if no identifier is given e.g. " " or "", we will create a unique string automatically</p>` | ||
| - `array<string, string> $filter` | ||
| - `string[] $filter` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The type hint for the $filter parameter in css_identifier has been changed to string[]. However, the default value for this parameter in the source code ([' ' => '-', '/' => '-', '[' => '', ']' => '']) and the @phpstan-param array<string,string> $filter annotation suggest it's a map (an associative array of string to string), not a list of strings (string[]).
Could you verify if this change accurately reflects the function's expected input? If it's indeed a map, array<string, string> or a similar map-like notation would be more accurate here.
|
|
||
| **Parameters:** | ||
| - `string $param` | ||
| - `array<array-key, mixed> $param` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The type hint for the $param parameter in getUrlParamFromArray has been changed from string to array<array-key, mixed>. However, the actual PHP function signature in src/voku/helper/UTF8.php (line 5042) shows this parameter as string $param.
It seems the documentation generator might have picked up a type from a different context or made an error. The type should likely remain string to accurately reflect the function's first parameter.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
3320-3332: Add newstr_limit_in_bytemethod signature
Great addition for byte-based string truncation. Consider adding an example snippet to illustrate its behavior with multibyte characters.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
3325-3325: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
3326-3326: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
3327-3327: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
3328-3328: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
3331-3331: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(38 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
559-559: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
622-622: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
667-667: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
736-736: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
770-770: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
790-790: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1040-1040: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1266-1266: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1317-1317: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1360-1360: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1361-1361: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1364-1364: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1378-1378: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1388-1388: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1486-1486: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1512-1512: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
1714-1714: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
2416-2416: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
2566-2566: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
2809-2809: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
2823-2823: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
2941-2941: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3014-3014: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3027-3027: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3293-3293: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3310-3310: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3325-3325: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3326-3326: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3327-3327: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3328-3328: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3331-3331: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3522-3522: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3605-3605: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
3844-3844: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
4040-4040: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
4114-4114: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
4961-4961: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
5126-5126: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
5160-5160: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
5182-5182: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
5267-5267: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)
1360-1361: ClarifygetUrlParamFromArrayparameter types
Switching fromstring $paramtoarray<array-key, mixed> $paramand likewise for$dataimproves type accuracy for nested data parsing. Ensure examples and unit tests align with this updated signature.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
1360-1360: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
1361-1361: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
1368-1368: Use explicit array shape inget_file_typesignature
Specifyingarray{ext: null|string, mime: null|string, type: null|string}for$fallbackenhances documentation precision and aids static analysis.
1378-1378: Document return type as explicit array shape
The return typearray{ext: null|string, mime: null|string, type: null|string}clearly matches the parameter shape. Nice consistency.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
1378-1378: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
1388-1388: Specify$possible_charsasstringinget_random_string
Updating from genericTtostringimproves readability and type safety. Ensure callers pass a valid characters string.🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
1388-1388: Unordered list style
Expected: plus; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
2 participants
Summary
Testing
composer installin build directoryphp generate_docs.phphttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_684d22b9b3708322a34ee0be904f9fe3
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit