RFC: Web Platform Feature Known Issues Management Repository

[jcscottiii]

Rendered

[foolip]

Any repo name will be OK, but I wonder if the shorter web-features-issues would be acceptable?

[jgraham]

Just to make sure the discussion we've had in the meeting is recorded here:

This RFC needs to explain what problem it's trying to solve. The way it's phrased here it seems like it's about implementing a feature on webstatus.dev. But given there are existing concerns about the incentive structure generated by that project being detrimental to the overall health of the web platform tests project, anything that's motivated by that project needs to explain how it's going to address those concerns.

Also, if this is something that requires governance, the governance section needs to be much more explicit, rather than just saying "will be established".

[Ms2ger]

I also don't understand what this is for