Overhaul errors for consistency and correctness

[yanthomasdev]

Changes

This PR does an overhaul of all error messages to make them more consistent with each other, namely:

• fixing missing full stop at the end of messages.
• adding missing backticks to code excerpts.
• adding () to differentiate functions from simple properties/objects.
• improving error titles/messages with more context.

Testing

I am not sure if adding backticks in a few places could break rendering, we'll be sure once we get the automated PR on docs.

Docs

That's all it is.

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: dd42e62

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 10.51%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 17 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	Build: hybrid site (static + server)	10.6 s	9.6 s	+10.51%

---

_{Comparing errors-fix (dd42e62) with main (272185b)}

[ArmandPhilippot]

LGTM, I left some suggestions but none related to your changes (I spotted a few broken links).

But it seems you'll need to also update some tests because of the renamed errors (capitalization > tests failures).

[ArmandPhilippot]

I wonder if we should take this opportunity to adjust the wording for consistency:

-Server-side rendering
+On-demand rendering

But this is used in several places so it might be easier to check the occurrence in an editor. That's said, this can also happen another time. Just a though while reviewing!

[yanthomasdev]

True! I had that planned as a follow-up but forgot to mention in the PR description

[ArmandPhilippot]

I'm not sure about the view transition test, but core-image.test.ts is flaky! I had to rerun the test a few times this morning to merge a docs-only PR. So, LGTM! Thank you!

[delucis]

Mostly looks great — @yanthomasdev! Just one comment.