Fix RemarkRehype types#9147
Merged
Merged
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 02f9d84 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
github-actions
Bot
added
feat: markdown
natemoo-re
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2023
Member
natemoo-re
left a comment
natemoo-re
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for finally tackling this!
ematipico
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2023
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Supersedes and closes #6211
The linked PR above explains why the types is incorrect today. This PR merges into
nextwhich includes the latest versions of the remark/rehype plugins, which I think should work now.Testing
Existing test should pass. Also tested the types in an Astro config manually.
Docs
n/a. bug fix.