X.Prelude: Adapt cleanKeyMask to stripModMask addition to core#687
Draft
liskin wants to merge 1 commit intoxmonad:masterfrom
Draft
X.Prelude: Adapt cleanKeyMask to stripModMask addition to core#687liskin wants to merge 1 commit intoxmonad:masterfrom
liskin wants to merge 1 commit intoxmonad:masterfrom
Conversation
(Unfortunately MIN_VERSION_xmonad has only 3 parameters and adding a cabal flag seems too heavyweight.) Relates: xmonad/xmonad#374 Relates: xmonad/xmonad#172 Relates: xmonad#290
3 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
(Unfortunately MIN_VERSION_xmonad has only 3 parameters and adding a
cabal flag seems too heavyweight, so this doesn't really work. 😞)
Relates: xmonad/xmonad#374
Relates: xmonad/xmonad#172
Relates: #290
Checklist
I've read CONTRIBUTING.md
I've considered how to best test these changes (property, unit, manually, ...) and concluded: The code change itself is low risk, but the ifdefs need some additional thoughts.
n/a I updated the
CHANGES.mdfile