Skip to content

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021 #16456

Closed

Description

@potiuk

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you help us to test the RC versions of the providers and let us know in the comment,
if the issue is addressed there.

Providers that need testing

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider airbyte: 2.0.0rc2

Provider amazon: 2.0.0rc2

Provider apache.spark: 2.0.0rc2

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 2.0.0rc2

Provider dingding: 2.0.0rc2

Provider discord: 2.0.0rc2

Provider docker: 2.0.0rc2

Provider elasticsearch: 2.0.1rc1

Provider google: 4.0.0rc2

Provider hashicorp: 2.0.0rc2

Provider http: 2.0.0rc2

Provider microsoft.azure: 3.0.0rc2

Provider odbc: 2.0.0rc2

Provider opsgenie: 2.0.0rc2

Provider oracle: 2.0.0rc2

Provider papermill: 2.0.0rc2

Provider plexus: 2.0.0rc2

Provider postgres: 2.0.0rc2

Provider samba: 2.0.0rc2

Provider sftp: 2.0.0rc2

Provider slack: 4.0.0rc2

Provider snowflake: 2.0.0rc2

Provider ssh: 2.0.0rc2

Providers for which previous RC was fully tested (thanks @levyitay !)

Provider qubole: 2.0.0rc2

Providers that do not need testing

Those are providers that were either doc-only or had changes that do not require testing.

Activity

  1. added
    kind:metaHigh-level information important to the community
    on Jun 15, 2021
  2. potiuk commented on Jun 15, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    This would be great it we could have confirmation for most of the providers by Friday afternoon, so that I could release them then :)

  3. potiuk commented on Jun 15, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    @jmelot Also a kind request for you - it's the first release of Asana provider, so if you could test it as well and let us know in the comment, it would be great: https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/1.0.0rc1

  4. zhzhang commented on Jun 15, 2021

    @zhzhang
    Contributor

    Tested postgres connection changes on a Resdhift cluster, looks good to me.

  5. Goodkat commented on Jun 15, 2021

    @Goodkat
    Contributor

    Tested odbc connection, it works as expected with boolean parameters now:
    #15016 (comment)

  6. jmelot commented on Jun 15, 2021

    @jmelot
    Contributor

    Tested Asana provider, all seems to be well!

  7. nlecoy commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @nlecoy
    Contributor

    I've been using the fix of #15926 for work and everything looks fine! Also, I tested #15817 and its working too.

  8. pavelhlushchanka commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @pavelhlushchanka
    Contributor

    The package description says that the provider can be installed on top of existing airflow 2.*. I'm installing amazon provider and it requires airflow 2.1.

  9. potiuk commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    The package description says that the provider can be installed on top of existing airflow 2.*. I'm installing amazon provider and it requires airflow 2.1.

    Yep. We have an enty in changelog about it with warning. Do you think it's not enough ?

  10. pavelhlushchanka commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @pavelhlushchanka
    Contributor

    I tested #15173 and #15848. Works fine.

  11. pavelhlushchanka commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @pavelhlushchanka
    Contributor

    The package description says that the provider can be installed on top of existing airflow 2.*. I'm installing amazon provider and it requires airflow 2.1.

    Yep. We have an enty in changelog about it with warning. Do you think it's not enough ?

    @potiuk I believe it's a bit confusing. If such info is added, then it should be precise. But it's up to you.

  12. potiuk commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    @potiuk I believe it's a bit confusing. If such info is added, then it should be precise. But it's up to you.

    I will ask others what they think. I am inclined to release new rc for that together with elasticsearch (but let's continue testing).

  13. amatellanes commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @amatellanes
    Contributor

    I tested #15680 and it works fine 👍

  14. levyitay commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @levyitay
    Contributor

    tested Qubole changes, looks good

  15. flolas commented on Jun 16, 2021

    @flolas
    Contributor

    Tested #16280 in prod env with k8s, it works fine.

  16. 9 remaining items

  17. MatthewRBruce commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @MatthewRBruce
    Contributor

    Tested #15490 - Fix unsuccessful KubernetesPod final_state call when is_delete_operator_pod=True. Works as expected.

  18. olivermeyer commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @olivermeyer
    Contributor

    #16327 works as expected.

  19. monti-python commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @monti-python
    Contributor

    #15637 works as expected as well

  20. natanweinberger commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @natanweinberger
    Contributor

    #15730 is just a whitespace linting fix 👍

    However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time (also for minor changes) and aren't listed here, should they be included?

  21. potiuk commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time (also for minor changes) and aren't listed here, should they be included?

    Auto-apply is specifically excluded as it was a change that applied to all providers (and main reason for this backwards-incompatible release) but it has been tested before. The other one is a docstring only (and those are excluded from changelog/testing).

  22. jedcunningham commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @jedcunningham
    Member

    Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions.

  23. potiuk commented on Jun 21, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions.

    Thanks @jedcunningham ! corrected the link to keep good track of it.

  24. tianjianjiang commented on Jun 22, 2021

    @tianjianjiang
    Contributor

    @potiuk I've tried to allocate some resource for testing #15026 but unfortunately not happening soon enough. However, at least the situation I've experienced before is coded in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026/files#diff-ba677556962f02c90a0e6933525d9d3f795e2d44a3d2229de1db9d1b68a067eb and since the datetime-related change is abstract while its upstream has only one change set of docstring lint (#15730), it is highly likely #15026 will work.

  25. JavierLopezT commented on Jun 22, 2021

    @JavierLopezT
    Contributor

    Hello. Regarding #13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test due to health reasons. I am sorry

  26. ngaranko commented on Jun 22, 2021

    @ngaranko
    Contributor

    #14701 works as expected.

  27. potiuk commented on Jun 22, 2021

    @potiuk
    MemberAuthor

    Hello. Regarding #13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test due to health reasons. I am sorry

    No worries! thanks for your contributions so far @JavierLopezT !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    kind:metaHigh-level information important to the communitytesting statusStatus of testing releases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions