Add support for RESTEasy4.x

[Leibnizhu]

• Add a test case for the new plugin, refer to the doc
• Add a component id in the component-libraries.yml ——(Already exists)
• Add a logo in the UI repo ——(Already exists)

• If this pull request closes/resolves/fixes an existing issue, replace the issue number. Closes #.
• Update the CHANGES log.

[wu-sheng]

Does this PR continue from #169? I can see code names are very similar.

[wu-sheng]

Does this PR continue from #169? I can see code names are very similar.

@Leibnizhu I need a confirmation about this.

[Leibnizhu]

Does this PR continue from #169? I can see code names are very similar.

codes are copy from resteasy 3.x, and scenario test cases are from #169.

what i have done:

1. correct the operation name made in SynchronousDispatcherInterceptor
2. fixed some error assertion in expectedData.yaml
3. the tests are passed in macos.

[wu-sheng]

@carlfranz If you have time, I hope you could confirm this copy/paste doesn't concern you.

@Leibnizhu Thanks for the update. Let's focus on the codes and tests, once it is passed, and Carlo doesn't object, we should be good.

[wu-sheng]

It seems UTs fail, could you recheck? Logs are here, https://github.com/apache/skywalking-java/runs/7107222730?check_suite_focus=true

[Leibnizhu]

It seems UTs fail, could you recheck? Logs are here, https://github.com/apache/skywalking-java/runs/7107222730?check_suite_focus=true

i have fixed it , but ci action seems to be stucked……

[wu-sheng]

It just waits for my manual approval, as this is your first pull request to this repo.

[wu-sheng]

Your UTs are still failing, please make sure you have checked all cases locally.

[carlfranz]

If you have time, I hope you could confirm this copy/paste doesn't concern you.

Hi @wu-sheng, codes is pretty the same, as we saw before the plugin for resteasy4 differs only by the dependency artifactId and groupId.

[wu-sheng]

If you have time, I hope you could confirm this copy/paste doesn't concern you.

Hi @wu-sheng, codes is pretty the same, as we saw before the plugin for resteasy4 differs only by the dependency artifactId and groupId.

Yes, I knew, as you mentioned in #169 (comment). This is the key point.
I just want to recheck with you, if this PR gets the tests passed, which were failed in the previous PR. Would you be OK if we get this merged? I don't want you to feel that your original codes(even they are test codes) are committed by another contributor. I want to be fair as much as possible.

[Leibnizhu]

Your UTs are still failing, please make sure you have checked all cases locally.

locally test pass:

1. ./mvnw --batch-mode clean verify install for failed CI test Java 11 / ubuntu
2. bash ./test/plugin/run.sh -f resteasy-4.x-scenario for resteasy-4.x plugin. tests for other plugins has passed in previous CI tests.

[carlfranz]

Would you be OK if we get this merged?

yes, there is no problem 😎