[v5.8] test: vendor container-libs podman-5.8#27986
Closed
Luap99 wants to merge 1 commit intocontainers:v5.8from
Closed
[v5.8] test: vendor container-libs podman-5.8#27986Luap99 wants to merge 1 commit intocontainers:v5.8from
Luap99 wants to merge 1 commit intocontainers:v5.8from
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Member
Author
|
Ok seems like we need a buildah with containers/buildah#6650 here vendored as well |
|
Cockpit tests failed for commit ae6f929. @martinpitt, @jelly, @mvollmer please check. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Ensure you have completed the following checklist for your pull request to be reviewed:
commits. (
git commit -s). (If needed, usegit commit -s --amend). The author email must matchthe sign-off email address. See CONTRIBUTING.md
for more information.
Fixes: #00000in commit message (if applicable)make validatepr(format/lint checks)Noneif no user-facing changes)Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?