Fix namespace resolution issue in LOG_EVERY_T

[skeptic-monkey]

int64 is a typedef defined within @ac_google_namespace@, while LOG_EVERY_T is defined within ::google:: namespace.
but @ac_google_namespace@ is configurable and might not always be "google".

It can result in a compilation error, int64 being undefined. using absolute namespace resolution with @ac_google_namespace@:: fixes it.

Also replaced 2 other hardcoded google:: usage.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #801 (c640c2f) into master (5addeed) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #801   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.20%   73.20%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        3281     3281           
=======================================
  Hits         2402     2402           
  Misses        879      879           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/glog/logging.h.in	80.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5addeed...c640c2f. Read the comment docs.

[skeptic-monkey]

I stuggle to see the link between my change and the failing tests on MacOS.

[sergiud]

Thanks for the PR. The macOS runner seems to be volatile or our tests flaky.

Can you provide a reproducer for the failures you are describing? I'm just wondering why our CI did not catch these problems.

[skeptic-monkey]

I honestly don't understand either, I checked and this part of the code seem covered by the tests.

I'll try to create a sample project that reproduce it. Meanwhile I can at least describe our setup.
We are integrating glog in our bazel based project, and we build on windows 11 using clang-cl.

[sergiud]

Thanks for the details.

@drigz It seems we need a Bazel runner that uses clang-cl in addition to MSVC. Is there a chance you can look into it?

[sergiud]

@skeptic-monkey Could you please rebase?

[skeptic-monkey]

@skeptic-monkey Could you please rebase?

Done.

[sergiud]

Thanks!