feat: add sorbet Ruby LSP server option

[notchairmk]

Adds Sorbet's LSP as an additional Ruby language server option.

These are the listed server capabilities

{
  "textDocumentSync": 1,
  "hoverProvider": true,
  "completionProvider": {
    "triggerCharacters": [
      ".",
      ":",
      "@",
      "#"
    ]
  },
  "definitionProvider": true,
  "typeDefinitionProvider": true,
  "implementationProvider": true,
  "referencesProvider": true,
  "documentHighlightProvider": true,
  "documentSymbolProvider": true,
  "workspaceSymbolProvider": true,
  "codeActionProvider": {
    "codeActionKinds": [
      "quickfix",
      "source.fixAll.sorbet",
      "refactor.extract",
      "refactor.rewrite"
    ],
    "resolveProvider": true
  },
  "documentFormattingProvider": false,
  "renameProvider": {
    "prepareProvider": true
  }
}

[cla-bot]

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have @notchairmk on file. You can sign our CLA at https://zed.dev/cla. Once you've signed, post a comment here that says '@cla-bot check'.

[notchairmk]

@cla-bot check

[cla-bot]

The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request!

[vitallium]

@notchairmk Thanks for the pull request! I think for specific things like sorbet, it would make sense to have it as a separate extension since they have specific uses. I can help you with creating a separate extension for the sorbet LSP if you want. For instance, we did the same thing with the extension for the HAML template language.

[notchairmk]

Thanks for the info @vitallium. Broke it out into a separate extension and opened up zed-industries/extensions#1657

[notchairmk]

Closing since the Sorbet extension's been merged

[vitallium]

@notchairmk thanks! I will be using it! ❤️

[andyw8]

Should this decision be reconsidered since Steep is being added in #102 ?

[vitallium]

Should this decision be reconsidered since Steep is being added in #102 ?

Sure, I think it’s really up to @notchairmk. At first, I was a bit skeptical about adding sorbet or steep, but I was kinda wrong. Now, I actually think it’d be awesome to have both language servers available to give a solid Ruby experience, especially with the nice improvements we've made around detecting the right startup configurations for language servers.

[notchairmk]

I'd be happy to revive this. I do want to note though that issues like notchairmk/zed-sorbet#6 will still keep showing up.