Skip to content

chore: Use PublishPipelineArtifact in place of PublishBuildArtifacts to reduce CI fragility #1213

Merged
Czaki merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
change_to_publish_pipeline_artifact
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

chore: Use PublishPipelineArtifact in place of PublishBuildArtifacts to reduce CI fragility #1213
Czaki merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
change_to_publish_pipeline_artifact

Conversation

@Czaki
Copy link
Collaborator

@Czaki Czaki commented Oct 21, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Replace PublishBuildArtifacts with PublishPipelineArtifact in the CI pipeline to enhance stability.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Azure Pipelines configuration for improved artifact handling.
    • Introduced parameters for test path and cache directory.
    • Set Python version to 3.11 and architecture to x64 for consistency in builds.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request replaces the PublishBuildArtifacts task with PublishPipelineArtifact in the Azure Pipelines configuration to improve CI stability. The change affects how build artifacts are published in the pipeline.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Replaced PublishBuildArtifacts task with PublishPipelineArtifact task
  • Updated task name from PublishBuildArtifacts@1 to PublishPipelineArtifact@1
  • Changed input parameter 'pathToPublish' to 'targetPath'
  • Changed input parameter 'artifactName' to 'publishLocation'
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Azure Pipelines YAML configuration for a Python project. Two new parameters, test_path and cache_dir, are introduced. The configuration sets the Python version to 3.11 and architecture to x64, and includes pip caching with a version-specific key. The library installation process is updated to use a specific requirements file. Additionally, the artifact publishing method is changed from PublishBuildArtifacts@1 to PublishPipelineArtifact@1, with adjustments to input parameters. The final step executes a script based on the test_path parameter.

Changes

File Change Summary
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml Added parameters test_path and cache_dir (type: string); updated Python version to 3.11; changed artifact publishing from PublishBuildArtifacts@1 to PublishPipelineArtifact@1 with updated input parameters.

Poem

In the pipeline where rabbits hop,
New paths and caches help us top,
With Python three-point-one, oh so bright,
We publish our artifacts, taking flight!
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For smoother builds, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Czaki - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-5: LGTM! Consider adding parameter descriptions.

The addition of test_path and cache_dir parameters enhances the flexibility of the pipeline configuration, which aligns with the PR objective of reducing CI fragility.

Consider adding brief descriptions for these parameters to improve clarity:

- name: test_path
  type: string
  default: ''
  description: 'Path to the test scripts or executables'
- name: cache_dir
  type: string
  default: ''
  description: 'Directory for caching pip packages'
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d348fc and d7911c0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.azure-pipelines/pyinstaller.yaml (3)

Line range hint 1-27: Overall, these changes improve pipeline flexibility and reliability.

The modifications align well with the PR objective of reducing CI fragility. The introduction of parameters, update to Python 3.11, and switch to PublishPipelineArtifact are all positive changes.

To further enhance this PR:

  1. Consider adding parameter descriptions as suggested earlier.
  2. Verify Python 3.11 compatibility across the project.
  3. Double-check the artifact publishing configuration.
  4. Ensure consistent use of PublishPipelineArtifact across all pipeline files.

22-25: LGTM! Verify artifact publishing configuration.

The change from PublishBuildArtifacts@1 to PublishPipelineArtifact@1 aligns with the PR objective and should improve performance and reliability.

Please verify the correct configuration of the new task:

  1. Ensure dist2 is the correct path for the artifacts.
  2. Confirm that execs is the intended publish location.

Run the following script to check for any remaining uses of PublishBuildArtifacts:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining uses of PublishBuildArtifacts

# Test: Search for PublishBuildArtifacts in YAML files
rg -g '*.y*ml' 'PublishBuildArtifacts'

If this script returns any results, consider updating those instances as well for consistency.


Line range hint 7-18: LGTM! Verify Python 3.11 compatibility.

The update to Python 3.11 and the use of specific constraint files improve consistency and potentially performance. The split installation process ensures up-to-date core packages.

Please ensure all dependencies and code are compatible with Python 3.11. Run the following script to check for any Python version-specific imports or syntax:

If this script returns any results, review those files to ensure compatibility.

@Czaki Czaki added the skip check PR title skip spellcheking PR title label Oct 21, 2024
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip check PR title skip spellcheking PR title

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments