Skip to content

[SCENARIO-FAILED] Ego cannot expand drivable area to the opposite traffic lane during avoidance #93

Open

Description

@diegoyabuki

Test Information

Scenario Suite Catalog
Test-dense-urban_ITRI2 Dense Urban Urban-Dense
Test-dense-urban_ITRI3 Dense Urban Urban-Dense
Test-dense-urban_ITRI4 Dense Urban Urban-Dense

Test Runs

Test Week Test Run Link Failure Rate Source Version Notes
2025-04-13 Test-dense-urban_ITRI2 1/1 (ea21db7c) Latest failure at time of issue creation
2025-06-08 Test-dense-urban_ITRI2 1/1 (ae6b7de6) Latest ongoing failure (at 2025-06-09)
2025-04-13 Test-dense-urban_ITRI3 1/1 (ea21db7c) Latest failure at time of issue creation
2025-06-08 Test-dense-urban_ITRI3 1/1 (ae6b7de6) Latest ongoing failure (at 2025-06-09)
2025-04-13 Test-dense-urban_ITRI4 1/1 (ea21db7c) Latest failure at time of issue creation
2025-06-08 Test-dense-urban_ITRI4 1/1 (ae6b7de6) Latest ongoing failure (at 2025-06-09)

Failure Description

The ego vehicle is unable to expand the drivable area during the obstacle avoidance and is forced to stop behind the NPC.

Expected Behavior

The ego vehicle should be able to drive through the opposite direction traffic lane to perform an obstacle avoidance.

Affected Repositories

Similar Issues

No response

Due date

No response

Updates

  • 2025-04-21: Issue creation

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Apr 21, 2025
  2. added theissue type on May 19, 2025
  3. changed the title [-][SCENARIO-FAILED] Test-dense-urban_ITRI(2|3|4) - Ego cannot expand drivable area to the opposite traffic lane during avoidance[/-] [+][SCENARIO-FAILED] Ego cannot expand drivable area to the opposite traffic lane during avoidance[/+] on Jun 4, 2025
  4. diegoyabuki commented on Jun 9, 2025

    @diegoyabuki
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Looking into the static obstacle avoidance configuration file in the autoware_launch module, it seems that the feature should be able to perform avoidance using the opposite traffic lane.
    Other avoidance scenarios, such as this are passing, which could point to the issue being related to the road handedness (works on LHT, fails on RHT).

  5. removed their assignment
    on Jun 9, 2025
  6. added theissue type on Jun 9, 2025
  7. stale commented on Aug 30, 2025

    @stale

    This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.

  8. self-assigned this
    on Oct 13, 2025
  9. diegoyabuki commented on Oct 13, 2025

    @diegoyabuki
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Upon further analysis a problem with the map was identified. This issue should be handled by the ODD WG, so I will transfer it back to our repo.

  10. added theissue type on Oct 13, 2025
  11. added
    type:map-fixFixing the map of a failing scenario.
    and removed
    type:bugIssues raised by the ODD WG.
    on Oct 13, 2025
  12. diegoyabuki commented on Oct 13, 2025

    @diegoyabuki
    CollaboratorAuthor

    The ego vehicle's neighbor lanelet was not sharing a common linestring. The map was fixed and the scenarios updated. Once we have confirmation that the problem was solved we can close this issue.

  13. moved this to Awaiting Approval in ODD Working Groupon Oct 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

type:map-fixFixing the map of a failing scenario.

Type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions